🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it feels like it’s time for a re-evaluation. As time has passed, an observance that was initiated as a celebration and reminder of the past, cultural identity and bonds between global Black communities, has developed a commercial tone, broadening to incorporate events where Black people are paid to talk to white audiences about hidden biases and active solidarity. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s generated a rise in the business of showcasing anti-racist commitment. However, that period has concluded. The wave has peaked, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what raising awareness is for.

The History of Black History Observance

First commemorated in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was established in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with a week of remembrance and recognition in the second week of February. Black History Month grew out of this movement and was publicly established in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the United States and Canada in the second month, but also in the tenth month in the UK, the Federal Republic of Germany, Ireland and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The period has transformed since its inception, focusing less on the accounts of colonial slavery and fights for racial justice, and more on notable African descendants in politics, culture, and activism, and broadly celebrating the input Black people have made to mold society. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with talks and cultural events. But the method the observance is observed is a indication of the political moment. How it develops is a valuable example in how co-option leads to weakening: the transformation of Black History Month has hindered the objective of it, which is to confront structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Little demonstrates how crucial it is to reconsider Black History Month as much as the current time in which it takes place this year. In the UK, a revitalized conservative movement in the form of the Reform political group is top in opinion ratings. In the recent season we observed the biggest extreme right demonstration in the history of Britain. the Conservative leader, the Black leader of the Conservative party, is a strong critic of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a place where a legislator feels emboldened to state that a lack of white people in parts of a city is a cause for alarm. Meanwhile, extreme conservative groups are growing in Europe as a whole.

In the US, a significant offensive against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been taken, frequently with success, to the supreme judicial bodies of the country. A campaign to scrub Black history and legacy from the records is in progress. One of the former president's early administrative commands aimed at the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the prestigious establishment, alleging that they of a organized and extensive campaign to rewrite our Nation’s history” by representing the nation “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

Given these circumstances, the observance symbolises how little it can be effective if it is confined to either dutiful corporate observances, or stripped of political content commemorations of historical achievements, rather than confronting the realities of the present. It also reveals how its limited duration means that it is disconnected from the more extensive continuous action that is necessary. An academic expert, a prof at an educational institution, articulated it most accurately when she raised concerns about the fleeting superficial actions of the celebration. “The issue with embracing a superficial method”, she commented, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month turns into a transient display rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Establishing how to adapt, revise and extend efforts for fair treatment and appreciation in such moments of dejection and worry is a difficult task. There is a inclination to just discontinue things like Black History Month altogether, thinking they are no longer suitable, or are relics of an period that has failed to deliver.

Yet, in spite of all this, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and tradition of activism for racial justice – local anti-racism groups, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and indeed, including corporate presentations – constitute an foundation that a lot of work has been dedicated to. It is there not just to decay as the situation evolves (and in fact, declines), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month seem? To begin with, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is distributed across all seasons (as various establishments are already starting to implement), parts of its content (particularly around notable African descendants) incorporated into academic syllabi. It would also be a era that does not evade political issues, and provides room for citizens, particularly the younger generation, to express their concerns and stories. What value has mere awareness of the past when it ignores the contemporary truth of extreme conservative demonstrations in the street? Institutions who mark it should not be pacified with the passive language of hidden discrimination and sensitivity to minor insults, but faced with the dangers that face all if opposition to discrimination is not approached earnestly. In short, Black History Month should be made contemporary, critical, and reactive. Maybe an entire name rebrand is necessary – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.